Bts or exo
- Thread starter Mmxos
- Start date
boti
Administrator
Yes.
EXO is the better. group, better music, better choreography, better dancers, better singers. EXO was the first group that caught my attention.
Dynamite was not a copy of Bruno Mars's Uptown Funk, it was a copy of everything Bruno Mars and the jewish thief Mark Ronson stole - that Bruno Marc song is a put-up-together of multiple songs.
Their asses belong in jail. Theft shouldn't be left unpunished.
The blatant theft in the video of Yoongi, with the hands in the background, which they even put it so often in the front - it is the first time I have seen this and I am amazed over the fact, that when his video was released, not one single newspaper criticized the theft. Nor was it ever mentioned.
EXO is not more famous than BTS internationally.
But it's funny because I was writing about the year 2016, when BTS was fully catering to the jewish gay pedophiles and that's how they were suddenly mentioned all over the place, this and also the fact that Bang himself is a sick gay pedophile, so he had the better cards, than the SM portfolio of managers.
I found this thread of people wondering how comes, that BTS took over EXO between 2016-2017 in terms of popularity.
Well, people, read my work. That's how they took over EXO.
I don't know if this is true, or not, someone would have to send me the SM financial report to look over it, but not only did I analyze in detail how little BTS is receiving (because Bang does not want them to be that rich and independent, especially Jungkook), but also how it seems, that every other band is getting more paid, than BTS.
www.quora.com
I always felt what is written in this post, that no matter how much BTS were pushed, EXO had more impact. I guess some people notice better music and performance when they see it, even if it's not promoted in the news.
I personally have listen more to EXO songs, than BTS. Until around 2020 when I barely kept listen to BTS because their songs got so bad, that I couldn't start any song out of pleasure. Except Jungkook's My Time and some of Namjoon's songs.
EXO is the better. group, better music, better choreography, better dancers, better singers. EXO was the first group that caught my attention.
Dynamite was not a copy of Bruno Mars's Uptown Funk, it was a copy of everything Bruno Mars and the jewish thief Mark Ronson stole - that Bruno Marc song is a put-up-together of multiple songs.
Their asses belong in jail. Theft shouldn't be left unpunished.
The blatant theft in the video of Yoongi, with the hands in the background, which they even put it so often in the front - it is the first time I have seen this and I am amazed over the fact, that when his video was released, not one single newspaper criticized the theft. Nor was it ever mentioned.
EXO is not more famous than BTS internationally.
But it's funny because I was writing about the year 2016, when BTS was fully catering to the jewish gay pedophiles and that's how they were suddenly mentioned all over the place, this and also the fact that Bang himself is a sick gay pedophile, so he had the better cards, than the SM portfolio of managers.
I found this thread of people wondering how comes, that BTS took over EXO between 2016-2017 in terms of popularity.
Well, people, read my work. That's how they took over EXO.
I don't know if this is true, or not, someone would have to send me the SM financial report to look over it, but not only did I analyze in detail how little BTS is receiving (because Bang does not want them to be that rich and independent, especially Jungkook), but also how it seems, that every other band is getting more paid, than BTS.
Do BTS or EXO get paid more? If so, by how much?
Answer: Exo has more money than BTS. But this is also due to the fact that Exo was known from the beginning and had an incredible number of concerts in a few years (2012-2016). Thus, their entertainment has earned a lot of money, of which Exo probably gets only 20% although the group has absolute...
I always felt what is written in this post, that no matter how much BTS were pushed, EXO had more impact. I guess some people notice better music and performance when they see it, even if it's not promoted in the news.
I personally have listen more to EXO songs, than BTS. Until around 2020 when I barely kept listen to BTS because their songs got so bad, that I couldn't start any song out of pleasure. Except Jungkook's My Time and some of Namjoon's songs.
Yes.
EXO is the better. group, better music, better choreography, better dancers, better singers. EXO was the first group that caught my attention.
Dynamite was not a copy of Bruno Mars's Uptown Funk, it was a copy of everything Bruno Mars and the jewish thief Mark Ronson stole - that Bruno Marc song is a put-up-together of multiple songs.
Their asses belong in jail. Theft shouldn't be left unpunished.
The blatant theft in the video of Yoongi, with the hands in the background, which they even put it so often in the front - it is the first time I have seen this and I am amazed over the fact, that when his video was released, not one single newspaper criticized the theft. Nor was it ever mentioned.
EXO is not more famous than BTS internationally.
But it's funny because I was writing about the year 2016, when BTS was fully catering to the jewish gay pedophiles and that's how they were suddenly mentioned all over the place, this and also the fact that Bang himself is a sick gay pedophile, so he had the better cards, than the SM portfolio of managers.
I found this thread of people wondering how comes, that BTS took over EXO between 2016-2017 in terms of popularity.
Well, people, read my work. That's how they took over EXO.
I don't know if this is true, or not, someone would have to send me the SM financial report to look over it, but not only did I analyze in detail how little BTS is receiving (because Bang does not want them to be that rich and independent, especially Jungkook), but also how it seems, that every other band is getting more paid, than BTS.
Do BTS or EXO get paid more? If so, by how much?
Answer: Exo has more money than BTS. But this is also due to the fact that Exo was known from the beginning and had an incredible number of concerts in a few years (2012-2016). Thus, their entertainment has earned a lot of money, of which Exo probably gets only 20% although the group has absolute...
I always felt what is written in this post, that no matter how much BTS were pushed, EXO had more impact. I guess some people notice better music and performance when they see it, even if it's not promoted in the news.
I personally have listen more to EXO songs, than BTS. Until around 2020 when I barely kept listen to BTS because their songs got so bad, that I couldn't start any song out of pleasure. Except Jungkook's My Time and some of Namjoon's songs.
Well how long a forced group can survive like bts or bp.
Its not that i am in favour of exo or rv than bts or bp
But i can not bear to listen one bts song fully, always skipping and trying to hear better voice etc
But with exo, i listened to their songs max 3 and i didnt skipped once, and i am saying all this being non biased
With blackpink if you all noticed there is some experienced person who mix their voices so well that u like listening to it
But now i already have stopped listening to everyone after knowing what they all do to become famous yuckkk
With rv i prefer bae irene voice over wendy its addictive and i am trying my best to stop listening to them as well
Scooter braun where ever is attached to person, he ruins with them with fake popularity
He ruined bieber now bts and txt
And there will be alot more in future
Anyways bts have to come down before they R exposed more globally as hookers can not be the representative of a country lol.
boti
Administrator
Yes, that's right, thinking about it, I also skipped BTS, but not EXO. BlackPink has only 2, maybe 3 songs to hear, but RedVelvet indeed, has the better songs.
It's the same with Britney Spears vs Christina. The difference is undoubtedly, but Britney had fine-ass songs, while Christina only had a few singles. Even though they can't be compared, because Christina can sing, and Britney was never a singer, but every Britney album has about 4 songs that can be listened to, without skipping.
It's not just Scooter ruining the people, Scooter can be singled out, because people know is face, know his name. Labels in general ruin everyone. The difference is the people hide behind closed doors, while Scooter is a middle man who likes to be in the public's eye. He does not act autonomously. He has his people and investors behind him, like every other label.
Yeah
Btw thankyou for all these explainations and exposing
