Andrew Huberman
- Thread starter boti
- Start date
boti
Administrator
A "hit" piece in the New York Magazine "exposes" Andrew Huberman private life, and opinions have already been flooding the room, labeling the article as the work of an "angry ex-girlfriend".
The article behind payroll can be found here:
Short version: He was allegedly having multiple relations at the same time with different women, while trying to get pregnant with his...other girlfriend. And some other issues, such as him not holding a central/main tenure at Standford. He never said it out loud, but he brings his "position" at Standford at the beginning of every podcast.
This article summs it up:
www.theguardian.com
..and this is my opinion:
I followed Andrew Huberman's podcast for a while and...appreciated half of his podcast being about commercials, especially his almost 10-minute-long introduction of those sponsors. Which is perfectly fine (even though I was being ironic).
Some podcasters/comedians/PEOPLE BEING SPONSERED are mocking sometimes the people sponsoring them.
My gut feeling about him was not a positive one. I assumed that behind the "nice" image he...sponsors...something isn't right. The content of the article doesn't surprise me.
I haven't found his content to be particularly interesting - he is a guy/man who found popularity on the internet as a podcaster, same around Peter Attia and the rest of the gang.
I stopped following him when he pushed the sick homosexuality agenda and started wooing some demento "mentor" he had, who was a sick perverted gender dysphoric gay.
Haven't missed much, I haven't learned from his podcasts and his friendship with Lex Friedman isn't something to be ignored. Their gayness to each other, covered under "friendship" is equally troubling and I find it very often for men who abuse women - which is what Andrew Huberman did to his girlfriend, if the stories in the article are true - to be sick perverted gays at the same time. There is often a relation between abusing and using women, while being a sick gay-o.
It shouldn't come as a surprise that gays started defending him, gays who also enjoyed "sudden" fame:
Glenn Greenwald is the jewish sicko gay, who Snowden contacted to publish his leaked NSA files. Which is also the reason, why I don't trust Snowden.
Out of aaaaaalll the journalists in this world, the only trustworthy was the gay jew ?
C`mon...
Yes, hell hath no fury and this could be the case. Either it's all lies, or it is the truth. Nevertheless - all these guys - Rogans, Alex Jones's, Rhonda Patrick, Tim Pool, Peter Attia, etc...they look and act like controlled opposition.
They are out there saying
"I have nothing against gays", (but)...
"I have nothing against vegans", (but)...
nothing against, (but)...
They try to appeal to both sides, by being cowards, Joe Rogan is high as f+++ in his podcasts.
Here, together with Andrew Huberman, promoting drugs
Is the information in the article true? If yes, it doesn't surprise me.
If not, shame on the people who are dragging a person down, for the wrong reasons.
Is the private life of a person my business?
Yes, if the person does bad things because life on this planet doesn't work on a standalone basis. Nothing works like this. Society and the people around us encouraging bad things, it's what got us into the hell we're living today.
I do have something against evil and there is no "but".
The article behind payroll can be found here:
Short version: He was allegedly having multiple relations at the same time with different women, while trying to get pregnant with his...other girlfriend. And some other issues, such as him not holding a central/main tenure at Standford. He never said it out loud, but he brings his "position" at Standford at the beginning of every podcast.
This article summs it up:
‘Wellness bro’ Andrew Huberman is accused of lying to women he dates. Does it matter to his millions of listeners?
The Stanford neuroscientist is highly credentialed and endearingly earnest on his popular wellness podcast, but is now facing claims against his credibility
..and this is my opinion:
I followed Andrew Huberman's podcast for a while and...appreciated half of his podcast being about commercials, especially his almost 10-minute-long introduction of those sponsors. Which is perfectly fine (even though I was being ironic).
Some podcasters/comedians/PEOPLE BEING SPONSERED are mocking sometimes the people sponsoring them.
My gut feeling about him was not a positive one. I assumed that behind the "nice" image he...sponsors...something isn't right. The content of the article doesn't surprise me.
I haven't found his content to be particularly interesting - he is a guy/man who found popularity on the internet as a podcaster, same around Peter Attia and the rest of the gang.
I stopped following him when he pushed the sick homosexuality agenda and started wooing some demento "mentor" he had, who was a sick perverted gender dysphoric gay.
Haven't missed much, I haven't learned from his podcasts and his friendship with Lex Friedman isn't something to be ignored. Their gayness to each other, covered under "friendship" is equally troubling and I find it very often for men who abuse women - which is what Andrew Huberman did to his girlfriend, if the stories in the article are true - to be sick perverted gays at the same time. There is often a relation between abusing and using women, while being a sick gay-o.
It shouldn't come as a surprise that gays started defending him, gays who also enjoyed "sudden" fame:
Glenn Greenwald is the jewish sicko gay, who Snowden contacted to publish his leaked NSA files. Which is also the reason, why I don't trust Snowden.
Out of aaaaaalll the journalists in this world, the only trustworthy was the gay jew ?
C`mon...
Yes, hell hath no fury and this could be the case. Either it's all lies, or it is the truth. Nevertheless - all these guys - Rogans, Alex Jones's, Rhonda Patrick, Tim Pool, Peter Attia, etc...they look and act like controlled opposition.
They are out there saying
"I have nothing against gays", (but)...
"I have nothing against vegans", (but)...
nothing against, (but)...
They try to appeal to both sides, by being cowards, Joe Rogan is high as f+++ in his podcasts.
Here, together with Andrew Huberman, promoting drugs
Is the information in the article true? If yes, it doesn't surprise me.
If not, shame on the people who are dragging a person down, for the wrong reasons.
Is the private life of a person my business?
Yes, if the person does bad things because life on this planet doesn't work on a standalone basis. Nothing works like this. Society and the people around us encouraging bad things, it's what got us into the hell we're living today.
I do have something against evil and there is no "but".
