Ador vs NewJeans
- Autor subiect boti
- Dată creare
- Răspunsuri 72
- Vizualizări 3K
Administrator
- Înscris
- 6 Aug 2023
- Mesaje
- 2.821
- Subiect Autor
- #42
This one made me also laugh, at the same time fuelling my feeling of anger and disgust. They are trying to get away with a SERIES, not just one thing, but a SERIES of illegal actions they committed. No matter how many 130 lawyers they add up - at least based on what they claimed and presented to the world, Ador has done nothing wrong, nor do I believe that there has ever been even an intent to sack them.
The only thing that is happening, is that they are purposely driving themselves in dept, so that they don't pay a dime to Ador, once they lose.
www.allkpop.com
The only thing that is happening, is that they are purposely driving themselves in dept, so that they don't pay a dime to Ador, once they lose.
NewJeans adds 13 lawyers in legal battle with ADOR over contract validity
Girl group NewJeans has significantly expanded its legal representation ahead of the second hearing in its lawsuit to confirm the validity of its exc…
This one made me also laugh, at the same time fuelling my feeling of anger and disgust. They are trying to get away with a SERIES, not just one thing, but a SERIES of illegal actions they committed. No matter how many 130 lawyers they add up - at least based on what they claimed and presented to the world, Ador has done nothing wrong, nor do I believe that there has ever been even an intent to sack them.
The only thing that is happening, is that they are purposely driving themselves in dept, so that they don't pay a dime to Ador, once they lose.
NewJeans adds 13 lawyers in legal battle with ADOR over contract validity
Girl group NewJeans has significantly expanded its legal representation ahead of the second hearing in its lawsuit to confirm the validity of its exc…
Don't know but their situation is very fishy
Administrator
- Înscris
- 6 Aug 2023
- Mesaje
- 2.821
- Subiect Autor
- #44
Someone is funding their lazy asses and it's not even about them...it's about bang. They are just stupid and lazy, with no respect for anything. Made millions and don't want to fulfill their part of agreement. Just take the money and leave. They should be sentenced to jail.
Administrator
- Înscris
- 6 Aug 2023
- Mesaje
- 2.821
- Subiect Autor
- #45
"Digging their own graves"– Internet divided as Emotional Oranges reportedly hints a collab with NewJeans' Danielle amid ADOR legal controversy
On May 19, 2025, American pop duo Emotional Oranges posted a photo with NewJeans' Danielle on social media, hinting at a potential collaboration.
www.sportskeeda.com
The thing is, BTS... well, JUNGKOOK and TAEHYUNG will be "free" soon, and their (as in NewJeans) window will close. Their laziness and the entire fake drama they created, having major institutions in the industry stepping in (as they should have), and warn them about the unfairness and lack of responsibility of their actions, their constantly unlawful behaviour, ignoring court orders, doing whatever they want - not at all in a good way - and playing it all by pulling their fan's card, will fade and start hitting back even more, once Jungkook, Taehyung and the rest of BTS reappear.
As you've seen, nobody cares about Jin and Hoseok, proving what I said for years, that BTS is ... Jungkook and Taehyung. All the attention will be on them and I believe that more and more critique will go towards NewJeans.
They already lost and, as per some of the comments, no matter how many lawyers they pull in, there is still no grounds for terminating their contract.
Unfortunately, what people don't understand, is the damage they caused. Creating a society of people dependent of shit like social media, tv shows with gay men acting like baby-girls, this parasocial madness, the obsessiveness and the billions made out of commercials with the faces of those (primarily) guys from bands, is already pure evil. There is no time, no space, no breath allowed for anyone, even to think about wether this is wrong, or right.
It has become a IT HAS TO BE- issue.
By placing Bang/BigHit/Hybe in the position of victim - which has been impeccable played by them, leaving no room for fault, from them publicly placing themselves constantly at NewJean's feet, offering all services, overseeing social media (well...more or less, since...it's not like they went after people criticising NewJeans, like they usually do with BTS), to offering room for discussions, trying to solve the issue, and still fulfilling their part of the contract - all that NewHookers have caused, is to give more power to the wrong person.
Undoubtedly this will be a lesson for every major player in the business to oversee and control even more what their people are doing, creating even more severe and restrictive contracts. One way or another, they will do it, in a situation where they already had ALL the power.
If there is anything more replaceable than people, is all those stupid non-sensical "famous" people, such as kpoopers. Not only are they replaceable, they are so replaceable, that they are FORGOTTEN the moment the next object of obsession enters the room.
What remains, is a "handling the damage" situation and how those labels will get even more power than before, by excusing their actions with situations like this. A mix between plausible deniability, it's not me - it's the law, and the company has to protect its employers, investors and all artists...which will result in bigger penalties and less room for freedom, despite what it goes on the surface.
Because, let's not forget, the only thing that it is sure at this moment, is that Bang has lost and will still lose a lot of money, even if they win. The litigation costs and the fact, that those bitches ain't gonna pay half of billion penalties, or, they are going to have some stupid fans like now pay for their lazy asses.
That's the sad part of the story, which also angers me and hits close to home, because there are situations, whew, when someone wronged and harmed you, in the end any win is still a loss. the costs to fight for your right in court, doesn't cover the damages. Such as in this case.
Stock is speculation. Companies think 5 years in advance for the people under contract. Things are planned years in advance.
Those bitches have ruined all the work Bang most likely had prepared in the absence of BTS, had to suck in a loss of one of the major bands in the end, and there is no future in sight, because NewJeans will continue until the bitter end. I don't know how far their lawsuit can go, but I assume, that even if they lose, again, they will still try other things, only to not go back to Ador.
Bang has to fight out of principle and legality, they are really a victim in this case and kind of fighting for other companies as well, which is why they can't just ///let it go. If they are accused of breach of contract, it would be an enormous disaster.
Those spoiled bitches don't even have to worry that they won't be left with anything to live from, if they win, because they are used with someone paying for their hooker-pussy.
This is something that, when it comes to people who don't deserve it, it causing more harm than good. It doesn't cost then a thing and won't const them a thing. If they would have to pay for their legal fees, home, and all their bills, they would maybe be able to look at this situation from a different point of view, understand that they made a mistake, and take upon Bang's offer to sit at the table and find between closed doors the best solution for both parties to come out of this situation - like I've said from the beginning - some sort of 1-2 albums and one year of appearances, maybe a tour, and then they are let go and can do whatever they want. Rather than 5 more to go.
It would be insane, if any court of JUSTICE would allow them to simply quit their contract without paying the penalties THEY SIGNED AND AGREED TO.
And let's remember - paying the penalties doesn't mean that the story is over. They stil can't perform as Newjeans, can't perform anything related to Bang, can't do anything as the band they are affiliating themselves with. Even their lame attempt at a name change is still under name protection with Ador.
Even in the best case scenario, they still won't get the insanity that they are asking for, and their time is either way up.
Min Hee Jin and NewJeans had to mane sugar daddies at their feet, but, as sad as it is, and as I've quoted this before - "nothing beats a gay as better than a gay dick."
Meaning - in the end, the money comes from all the little girls obsessing over the horrible gayness put on the fron through boybands.
Nobody gives a fuck about NewJeans, people only cared for them because of the BTS affiliation. If they would have been smart, they would have used this card to be come powerful enough while BTS is gone, to establish themselves as a famous girlband, after BlackPink is going solo.
They are so stupid, they couldn't even see this and....I am sorry, but....again....they want to run away with millions of dollars, ignore the contract they signed, perform things they aren't even allowed to, cashing in all the revenues, and....how? for what reason? ARE THEY NUTS and STUPID more than they proved to be in the beginning? Is this even possible?
Administrator
- Înscris
- 6 Aug 2023
- Mesaje
- 2.821
- Subiect Autor
- #47
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA YEEES
Court decides, that NewJeans must pay 1 billion won (approximately $730,000 USD) per member to ADOR for every future violation.
I told you, that this will happen, that they violated not just their contract agreement, but also court's order.
Seunghun Ji ji.seunghun@mk.co.kr
Input : 2025-05-30 16:22:22
언어 변경하기
사진 확대
Newzins. Photo by Star TodayDB
The independent activities of New Jeans without doors have become impossible.
According to the legal community on the 30th, the 52nd Civil Affairs Department of the Seoul Central District Court ruled that "the debtor Newzins should not engage in entertainment activities independently or through a third party without prior approval or consent from the creditor, Ador, until the first judgment of the lawsuit to confirm the validity of the exclusive contract."
The court explained, "Since Newzins violated the obligations set in the provisional decision by performing under the new group name and releasing new songs before and after the provisional decision, it is necessary to order 'indirect coercion' (enforced enforcement) of Newzins to enforce the fulfillment of the obligations."
He added, "If debtors violate this obligation from the date they are served with this copy of the decision, pay 1 billion won each to creditors for each violation." The court served the original copy of the indirect compulsory decision to the creditor and the debtor's agent.
Indirect coercion is a kind of fine imposed if a court decision is not implemented. The court decides that each person should be compensated 1 billion won, and if the five members work together as independents, they have to pay 5 billion won to Adore.
As a result, it is expected that Newzins' independent activities will be virtually impossible. Here, independent activities refer to activities through readers or third parties that are not affiliated with Audor.
사진 확대
Newzins held an emergency press conference in November last year and announced the termination of its exclusive contract to Adore and began drawing its own activities. At the same time, he announced a new group name, 'NJZ'.
In response, Adore filed an injunction with the court to preserve the agency's status and prohibit the conclusion of an advertising contract. The court decided to cite the matter in March. The court ruled that Newzins members should not engage in entertainment activities on their own or through third parties without prior approval or consent from Adore.
Nevertheless, when the members showed signs of continuing their independent activities, such as going to a Hong Kong concert under the new name NJZ, Odor applied for indirect coercion.
In this regard, the court violated the provisional injunction decision and judged that there was a possibility of violation in the future. In addition, the indirect compulsory amount of 1 billion won per person was decided in consideration of the violation of Newzins' provisional disposition obligations, the damages of Adore, and the interests of Newzins.
Newzins had been running an SNS account named after the NJZ, but he deleted the name according to the court's judgment and set up a new account name by combining the initials of the members. The members are only communicating with the fans about their current situation without any activities.
Court decides, that NewJeans must pay 1 billion won (approximately $730,000 USD) per member to ADOR for every future violation.
I told you, that this will happen, that they violated not just their contract agreement, but also court's order.
Seunghun Ji ji.seunghun@mk.co.kr
Input : 2025-05-30 16:22:22
언어 변경하기
Newzins. Photo by Star TodayDB
The independent activities of New Jeans without doors have become impossible.
According to the legal community on the 30th, the 52nd Civil Affairs Department of the Seoul Central District Court ruled that "the debtor Newzins should not engage in entertainment activities independently or through a third party without prior approval or consent from the creditor, Ador, until the first judgment of the lawsuit to confirm the validity of the exclusive contract."
The court explained, "Since Newzins violated the obligations set in the provisional decision by performing under the new group name and releasing new songs before and after the provisional decision, it is necessary to order 'indirect coercion' (enforced enforcement) of Newzins to enforce the fulfillment of the obligations."
He added, "If debtors violate this obligation from the date they are served with this copy of the decision, pay 1 billion won each to creditors for each violation." The court served the original copy of the indirect compulsory decision to the creditor and the debtor's agent.
Indirect coercion is a kind of fine imposed if a court decision is not implemented. The court decides that each person should be compensated 1 billion won, and if the five members work together as independents, they have to pay 5 billion won to Adore.
As a result, it is expected that Newzins' independent activities will be virtually impossible. Here, independent activities refer to activities through readers or third parties that are not affiliated with Audor.
Newzins held an emergency press conference in November last year and announced the termination of its exclusive contract to Adore and began drawing its own activities. At the same time, he announced a new group name, 'NJZ'.
In response, Adore filed an injunction with the court to preserve the agency's status and prohibit the conclusion of an advertising contract. The court decided to cite the matter in March. The court ruled that Newzins members should not engage in entertainment activities on their own or through third parties without prior approval or consent from Adore.
Nevertheless, when the members showed signs of continuing their independent activities, such as going to a Hong Kong concert under the new name NJZ, Odor applied for indirect coercion.
In this regard, the court violated the provisional injunction decision and judged that there was a possibility of violation in the future. In addition, the indirect compulsory amount of 1 billion won per person was decided in consideration of the violation of Newzins' provisional disposition obligations, the damages of Adore, and the interests of Newzins.
Newzins had been running an SNS account named after the NJZ, but he deleted the name according to the court's judgment and set up a new account name by combining the initials of the members. The members are only communicating with the fans about their current situation without any activities.
Administrator
- Înscris
- 6 Aug 2023
- Mesaje
- 2.821
- Subiect Autor
- #50
Administrator
- Înscris
- 6 Aug 2023
- Mesaje
- 2.821
- Subiect Autor
- #52
I mean./...she's done, they're done.
The simple fact, that despite receiving GIFTS from everyone, in terms of legal consequences, and clear messages, that they are in the wrong, that ador did not breach anything and they would be better off taking a deal, they just go through with it and say no.
But now things are getting very ugly, because they falsified their testimony and they planned together with MHJ to take down the other female bands with their false claims, and ador. The "poor innocent girls".
I hope they rot in prison.
The messages, that NewJeans AND Min Hee Jin wanted to suppress prove something that no longer is a civil case, but a crime.
The simple fact, that despite receiving GIFTS from everyone, in terms of legal consequences, and clear messages, that they are in the wrong, that ador did not breach anything and they would be better off taking a deal, they just go through with it and say no.
But now things are getting very ugly, because they falsified their testimony and they planned together with MHJ to take down the other female bands with their false claims, and ador. The "poor innocent girls".
I hope they rot in prison.
The messages, that NewJeans AND Min Hee Jin wanted to suppress prove something that no longer is a civil case, but a crime.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
Administrator
- Înscris
- 6 Aug 2023
- Mesaje
- 2.821
- Subiect Autor
- #53
Haha, yes. They did that.
She`s nuts
biz.chosun.com
NewHookers fan account. They try everything, it's embarrassing. Nobody forced them to sign, and that's not even their claim.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
She`s nuts
Min Hee-jin launches 26 billion won lawsuit against HYBE as hearing begins
Min Hee-jin launches 26 billion won lawsuit against HYBE as hearing begins
biz.chosun.com
NewHookers fan account. They try everything, it's embarrassing. Nobody forced them to sign, and that's not even their claim.
Administrator
- Înscris
- 6 Aug 2023
- Mesaje
- 2.821
- Subiect Autor
- #54
I don't believe that the issue is a conflict of interest. Many times there are situations, where the same lawfirm represents both sides. They are running out of lies and attempts to try endless scenarios of lies.
You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments are hidden.
Administrator
- Înscris
- 6 Aug 2023
- Mesaje
- 2.821
- Subiect Autor
- #56
YouTuber Lee Jin-ho exposes Min Hee-jin's alleged Kakao messages claiming she orchestrated media manipulation amidst feud with HYBE Labels
On Thursday, June 5, following the ongoing feud between ADOR and Min Hee-jin, the YouTuber Lee Jin-ho kickstarted a livestream to take a deeper look into the legal battle between the two parties.
www.sportskeeda.com
Administrator
- Înscris
- 6 Aug 2023
- Mesaje
- 2.821
- Subiect Autor
- #59
correct (AdOR)
During the hearing, HYBE’s side stated, “The purpose of entering into this shareholder agreement was for ADOR’s growth and development. To achieve this, the defendant was obligated not to engage in any actions that could harm ADOR. However, the defendant violated this obligation, undermining the agreement’s purpose. As these violations were confirmed, the plaintiff terminated the agreement. Following the termination, a call option was exercised. In 2024 alone, Min Hee-jin was paid a salary of 2.7 billion KRW by ADOR. Meanwhile, she attempted to take NewJeans away. She is now demanding that her shares be bought for 27.8 billion KRW while still at ADOR, which is absolutely unacceptable.”
They continued, “The defendant claims that the issues with HYBE are insignificant, as if trying to deflect responsibility. They say everything started with an audit, but as early as March 14, 2024, Min Hee-jin was already discussing reviewing exclusive contracts in detail. On March 30, parents sent protest emails. The defendant claims the audit began due to these parental complaints, but on March 29, the defendant and the parents had already met at ADOR’s office. The meeting materials we submitted show that the ultimate goal was to exit HYBE. These materials also include claims about raising plagiarism allegations.”
HYBE further argued, “The growth and development of ADOR depend heavily on NewJeans, its sole artist, remaining with the company. It is critical for the artist to actively perform during their exclusive contract period. However, Min Hee-jin raised various allegations and provoked the parents. She instructed her company’s vice presidents to send protest emails under the parents’ names on March 29 and 30. Although they claim the parents’ protests began on March 31, we submitted evidence showing that the email drafts were prepared on March 30, along with their creation history.”
They added, “Looking at the drafting process, they started by referencing specific clauses in the exclusive contract, particularly termination clauses, and searched for provisions to dispute. They discussed who should receive the protest emails, deciding on the vice president rather than an external party. The emails included the phrase ‘perplexing,’ which Min Hee-jin frequently uses. She also gave detailed instructions, such as sending the email to a specific member’s mother or attaching Hyein’s father’s name. How could we not initiate an investigation and audit after discovering these actions? We ask the defendant this question.”
In contrast, Min Hee-jin’s side countered, “The shareholder agreement termination notice was issued on July 8. However, prior to that, there was an injunction, and the situation was maintained following the May injunction without issues. The plaintiff claims this is about ADOR’s independence from HYBE, the privatization of ADOR and NewJeans, and labels it as an attempt to usurp management rights. Only long after filing the lawsuit did the claim of ‘stealing NewJeans’ emerge.”
They elaborated, “The events unfolded as follows: after the July shareholder agreement termination, ADOR’s board, acting on instructions, removed Min Hee-jin as CEO. They demanded the return of her shares and even filed an injunction, which was dismissed. She exercised her put option and resigned in November. Meanwhile, NewJeans members were left like orphans, unable to receive proper care or protection. We asked for Min Hee-jin to be reinstated as CEO to restore the previous system, but they refused, leading to the events of November.”
They further argued, “The plaintiff’s claim suggests that the defendant was so cunning that, in April, they sent a corrective action email knowing it would trigger an audit and harassment. They allege we planned to hold a press conference to counter it, get fired, and then take the members with us. They treat this as a scripted novel, which they now call the amended claim. Until the lawsuit was filed, the stated cause was not ‘stealing NewJeans’ but ADOR’s independence and the privatization of ADOR and NewJeans. Beyond the May preliminary injunction materials, no additional evidence has been provided.”
HYBE insists that Min Hee-jin’s actions were calculated attempts to break away and take control of NewJeans, while Min Hee-jin’s camp argues she was pushed out unfairly for seeking independence and better protection for the group. As the legal battle intensifies, the court must now determine whether HYBE’s termination of the shareholder agreement was justified—or part of a larger power struggle over one of K-pop’s most influential rookie groups.
kbizoom.com
All i can say, is that the first and last part make sense and that as long as the stock was part of an agreement, which of course includes to not harm the company, and she did it not by self-defense, subjectively, or in order to prevent a harm done towards her, she cannot expect to receive money, after she tried to take over the company and orchestrated a fake "bullying" incident, that people now ignore. By that I mean, they ignore that those hookers gave a FALSE STATEMENT at the NATIONAL GOD DAMN HEARING.
During the hearing, HYBE’s side stated, “The purpose of entering into this shareholder agreement was for ADOR’s growth and development. To achieve this, the defendant was obligated not to engage in any actions that could harm ADOR. However, the defendant violated this obligation, undermining the agreement’s purpose. As these violations were confirmed, the plaintiff terminated the agreement. Following the termination, a call option was exercised. In 2024 alone, Min Hee-jin was paid a salary of 2.7 billion KRW by ADOR. Meanwhile, she attempted to take NewJeans away. She is now demanding that her shares be bought for 27.8 billion KRW while still at ADOR, which is absolutely unacceptable.”
They continued, “The defendant claims that the issues with HYBE are insignificant, as if trying to deflect responsibility. They say everything started with an audit, but as early as March 14, 2024, Min Hee-jin was already discussing reviewing exclusive contracts in detail. On March 30, parents sent protest emails. The defendant claims the audit began due to these parental complaints, but on March 29, the defendant and the parents had already met at ADOR’s office. The meeting materials we submitted show that the ultimate goal was to exit HYBE. These materials also include claims about raising plagiarism allegations.”
HYBE further argued, “The growth and development of ADOR depend heavily on NewJeans, its sole artist, remaining with the company. It is critical for the artist to actively perform during their exclusive contract period. However, Min Hee-jin raised various allegations and provoked the parents. She instructed her company’s vice presidents to send protest emails under the parents’ names on March 29 and 30. Although they claim the parents’ protests began on March 31, we submitted evidence showing that the email drafts were prepared on March 30, along with their creation history.”
They added, “Looking at the drafting process, they started by referencing specific clauses in the exclusive contract, particularly termination clauses, and searched for provisions to dispute. They discussed who should receive the protest emails, deciding on the vice president rather than an external party. The emails included the phrase ‘perplexing,’ which Min Hee-jin frequently uses. She also gave detailed instructions, such as sending the email to a specific member’s mother or attaching Hyein’s father’s name. How could we not initiate an investigation and audit after discovering these actions? We ask the defendant this question.”
In contrast, Min Hee-jin’s side countered, “The shareholder agreement termination notice was issued on July 8. However, prior to that, there was an injunction, and the situation was maintained following the May injunction without issues. The plaintiff claims this is about ADOR’s independence from HYBE, the privatization of ADOR and NewJeans, and labels it as an attempt to usurp management rights. Only long after filing the lawsuit did the claim of ‘stealing NewJeans’ emerge.”
They elaborated, “The events unfolded as follows: after the July shareholder agreement termination, ADOR’s board, acting on instructions, removed Min Hee-jin as CEO. They demanded the return of her shares and even filed an injunction, which was dismissed. She exercised her put option and resigned in November. Meanwhile, NewJeans members were left like orphans, unable to receive proper care or protection. We asked for Min Hee-jin to be reinstated as CEO to restore the previous system, but they refused, leading to the events of November.”
They further argued, “The plaintiff’s claim suggests that the defendant was so cunning that, in April, they sent a corrective action email knowing it would trigger an audit and harassment. They allege we planned to hold a press conference to counter it, get fired, and then take the members with us. They treat this as a scripted novel, which they now call the amended claim. Until the lawsuit was filed, the stated cause was not ‘stealing NewJeans’ but ADOR’s independence and the privatization of ADOR and NewJeans. Beyond the May preliminary injunction materials, no additional evidence has been provided.”
HYBE insists that Min Hee-jin’s actions were calculated attempts to break away and take control of NewJeans, while Min Hee-jin’s camp argues she was pushed out unfairly for seeking independence and better protection for the group. As the legal battle intensifies, the court must now determine whether HYBE’s termination of the shareholder agreement was justified—or part of a larger power struggle over one of K-pop’s most influential rookie groups.
HYBE and Min Hee-jin Argue in Court: Who Controls ADOR and NewJeans?
HYBE and former ADOR CEO Min Hee-jin clashed in court over the termination of their shareholder agreement.
kbizoom.com
All i can say, is that the first and last part make sense and that as long as the stock was part of an agreement, which of course includes to not harm the company, and she did it not by self-defense, subjectively, or in order to prevent a harm done towards her, she cannot expect to receive money, after she tried to take over the company and orchestrated a fake "bullying" incident, that people now ignore. By that I mean, they ignore that those hookers gave a FALSE STATEMENT at the NATIONAL GOD DAMN HEARING.